MELISSA WEINMAN STUDIO
  • Home
  • About
    • NPAF AiR project at Fort Union National Monument, NM
    • Video: The Power of Geometric Forms in My Painting
    • Video: My Reasons for Painting
    • Video: Working with the Model
    • Statement
    • Bio
    • Video: Richard Cole Commentary
    • Art on Fire: The Life and Work of Melissa Weinman by Richard Cole
    • Women and Art: Contested Territory by Judy Chicago and Edward Lucie-Smith
    • Full of Grace by Judith Dupre
    • The Weirdness of Modern Faith; or, Quantum Christianity in the Images of Melissa Weinman by Randall Kenan
    • Lives of the Saints by Elizabeth Forst
    • Melissa Weinman at Tatistcheff by Eleanor Heartney
    • The Oldest House Indian Shop Newsletter
  • Works
    • News & Exhibitions
    • Collaboration
    • New Work
    • Archive
    • Portraits >
      • Commission a Portrait
  • Learn
    • Private Instruction
    • Painting Supply List
    • Drawing Supply List
    • Recommended Reading List
    • Blog
    • Sacred Geometry
    • Videos >
      • Solvent Free Oil Painting Made Easy
      • Weinman Atelier for Youth
      • Salvator Mundi
    • Jurying & Critique Services
  • Contact
  • SHOP
    • panels

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERCEIVING TWO-DIMENSIONAL IMAGERY: Part 2

1/29/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
        To continue our discussion of the psychology of repetition, we must acknowledge that repetition is at work before we even recognize the subject of an image.

        Let’s consider something that happens subconsciously in the first second we look at a painting or drawing.  We notice the frame. 

       Remember that our eyes are always scanning imagery looking for something familiar, something we recognize.  The very first thing we comprehend is the shape of the frame.  Look at the square below.  The right angles of the corners are distinguishing features and familiar.  The repetition of right angles draws us from one to the next.  In a fraction of a second our eyes take in all four corners.  In the sweep from one to the next we notice the sides of the frame that connect them: two verticals and two horizontals.  The sides being of equal length, we recognize the shape as a square.

        The arrows represent the probable paths that our eyes take as they scan the image.  What do you suppose happens where paths cross or meet?  Such intersections create focal points.

        Now look at the rectangles below.  These are traditional shapes for compositions.  The vertically oriented rectangle is usually used for portraiture.  The horizontal one is commonly used for everything else: landscape, still life, and narrative depictions.


Picture


         The horizontal rectangle sends our eyes scanning in a lateral motion.  The vertical one tends to draw our attention from the top to the bottom.  Here’s where it gets interesting.  Our brains are able to look at an image with both an environmental and a retinal orientation to the picture plane.  These are terms used by Rudolf Arnheim in his classic, Art and Visual Perception:  A Psychology of the Creative Eye.  Specifically, with an environmental orientation one reads gravity into the pictorial space as if the picture plane were a picture window.  With retinal orientation one perceives the flatness of the picture plane as if it were the frame around a table top, where there is no top nor bottom.

        As we consider the rectangle, our environmental perception usually leads us from the upper regions to the lower.  When combined with our western perceptual tendency to read the picture plane from left to right, our eyes follow a diagonal path from upper left to lower right, unless focal points in the composition deter our eyes from this path, as the rectangles on the above right illustrate.

         Next time we will learn why it is important for artists to be intentional about the shape and orientation of their compositions.
0 Comments

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERCEIVING TWO-DIMENSIONAL IMAGERY:  Part 1

1/3/2015

0 Comments

 
     Our eyes naturally scan as we look.  In fact, it is difficult to hold our eyes in one position. They immediately tire (it’s called retina fatigue) and return to scanning.  Another reason that the eyes continuously scan is that they search for fields of recognition.  Upon recognition, the eyes continue to scan looking for more of the same.  This is the perceptual basis for the compositional strategy we call repetition.  It is important to note that repetition isn’t simply pleasing.  It sets the eye in motion from one familiar focal point to the next.

     Notice what your eyes are doing as they take in the Rembrandt painting below.  What do you notice first?  Where do your eyes take you next?  And then where?

Picture
     After scanning the image from left to right, hovering over the light angular shapes of the collars, my eyes then land on the gentleman who is third from the left.  Is this how the composition operates for you, too?

     I'll write about why this is so in Part 2 of this blog.  Suffice it to say for now, however subconsciously it occurs, our eyes begin looking at this painting with a lateral scan from left to right, guided largely by the perceptual tendency to follow the path of repeated conspicuous shapes--repetition.  For those of you who are still unfamiliar with this compositional principle, simply equate it with visually "connecting the dots."

To be continued.
0 Comments

    Author

    Melissa Weinman is both accomplished painter and professor. Twenty years in the studio and university classroom have shaped her ideas about looking at and making art. Her knowledge of art comes first hand, gleaned from experiences with art in American and European collections, in her practice of making figurative narrative paintings, and in teaching others how to give meaning to their own creative expressions.

    Archives

    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

2023 Copyright Melissa Weinman.  All rights reserved.