MELISSA WEINMAN STUDIO
  • Home
  • About
    • NPAF AiR project at Fort Union National Monument, NM
    • Video: The Power of Geometric Forms in My Painting
    • Video: My Reasons for Painting
    • Video: Working with the Model
    • Statement
    • Bio
    • Video: Richard Cole Commentary
    • Art on Fire: The Life and Work of Melissa Weinman by Richard Cole
    • Women and Art: Contested Territory by Judy Chicago and Edward Lucie-Smith
    • Full of Grace by Judith Dupre
    • The Weirdness of Modern Faith; or, Quantum Christianity in the Images of Melissa Weinman by Randall Kenan
    • Lives of the Saints by Elizabeth Forst
    • Melissa Weinman at Tatistcheff by Eleanor Heartney
    • The Oldest House Indian Shop Newsletter
  • Works
    • News & Exhibitions
    • Collaboration
    • New Work
    • Archive
    • Portraits >
      • Commission a Portrait
  • Learn
    • Private Instruction
    • Painting Supply List
    • Drawing Supply List
    • Recommended Reading List
    • Blog
    • Sacred Geometry
    • Videos >
      • Solvent Free Oil Painting Made Easy
      • Weinman Atelier for Youth
      • Salvator Mundi
    • Jurying & Critique Services
  • Contact
  • SHOP
    • panels

A Comparison Between Caravaggio’s Deposition of Christ and Van der Weyden’s Descent from the Cross, Part 1

12/15/2014

1 Comment

 
     Now that we’re familiar with the six-step process of the ©Follow Your Eyes Method, let’s use it to compare two famous paintings with the same subject.  In these two paintings the artists are depicting a scene following the crucifixion of Christ.  It is commonly referred to as the Deposition or Lamentation and is the 13th Station of the Cross.

Picture
Left: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio’s Deposition of Christ, 1602-3, approx. “120” x 80,” oil on canvas, Vatican Pinacoteca.   Right: Rogier van derWeyden’s The Descent from the Cross, c.1435, approx.  87”x 103,” oil on panel, Museo del Prado, Madrid
Picture
1.  Note your first impression of the image in terms of an idea or a feeling.    
     
     These paintings are about death and grief.  The Caravaggio painting has the feeling of flight, whereas the Van der Weyden feels congested and densely packed. 

 2.  Note the orientation and shape of the picture plane.

    Caravaggio composed his subject in a vertical rectangle emphasizing vertical movement. Our eyes travel from the upper right in an arc following the repeated pattern of heads and outstretched hands down to the lower left of the picture plane.
 
    Van der Weyden composed his painting in a horizontal rectangle emphasizing lateral movement.  His panel has an inverted T shape, which is mirrored in the upright T shape of the cross that breaks the upper frame in the center.  Our eyes start at the top center in this irregular protrusion and drop into the inverted T via the stem of the cross and ladder angling to the right.  Here we begin to follow the repeated pattern of heads from right to left.

     Although these two compositions differ in orientation it is pretty interesting to note that they both use right-to-left movement, which is contrary to our perceptual tendency to read images from left-to-right.  They “go against the tide,” so to speak, and thereby effectively create the sensation of struggle.
Picture
To be continued.
Picture
1 Comment
Mary Pena link
1/12/2021 01:50:30 pm

Thanks for wriiting

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Melissa Weinman is both accomplished painter and professor. Twenty years in the studio and university classroom have shaped her ideas about looking at and making art. Her knowledge of art comes first hand, gleaned from experiences with art in American and European collections, in her practice of making figurative narrative paintings, and in teaching others how to give meaning to their own creative expressions.

    Archives

    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

2023 Copyright Melissa Weinman.  All rights reserved.